|
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
abstract: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
This experiment uses ns2 to construct a simulation scenario comprising
|
|
|
|
|
one node and five different line bandwidths and latency. Specifically,
|
|
|
|
|
N3 and N4 nodes serve as a router to connect the networks. The queue
|
|
|
|
|
@ -14,38 +14,6 @@ abstract: |
|
|
|
|
|
DropTail. Then we further analyze the reasons for such different
|
|
|
|
|
performances of RED and DropTail. Furthermore, we conduct experiments
|
|
|
|
|
to determine the best fit scenario of RED and DropTail.
|
|
|
|
|
bibliography:
|
|
|
|
|
- references.bib
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="titlepage">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="center">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**COMP3014J Performance of Computer Systems**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Network Simulation Project Report**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Supervisor:**
|
|
|
|
|
Dr Nima Afraz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Group 9**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<figure>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Project Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -848,73 +816,3 @@ Finally, RED also has network performance issues. The average queue
|
|
|
|
|
length controlled by the RED algorithm often increases as the number of
|
|
|
|
|
connections increases, causing transmission delay jitter and causing
|
|
|
|
|
unstable network performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="longtable">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\|l\|l\|l\|l\|l\| & & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
& & & &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div id="tab:my-table">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name | Total Student Score | Total Student Score / Total Tasks Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|:-------------|:--------------------|:---------------------------------------:|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yuyang Wang | 45 | $45/120$ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Liuxin Yang | 42 | $42/120$ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jianxiang Yu | 33 | $33/120$ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | 120 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-2 | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project’s Student Score Breakdown Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div id="tab:my-table">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Signature: | <img src="images/Yuyang Wang.png" style="width:2in" alt="image" /> | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|:-----------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------|:----|:------|:-----------|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2-5 | Student 1 Name: Yuyang Wang | | Date: | 2022/11/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Signature: | <img src="images/QQ截图20220930091437.png" style="width:2in"
|
|
|
|
|
alt="image" /> | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Student 2 Name: Liuxin Yang | | Date: | 2022/11/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Signature: | <img src="images/Yu.jpg" style="width:2in" alt="image" /> | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Student 3 Name: Jianxiang Yu | | Date: | 2022/11/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Member Signature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason for the difference between the group contract and final
|
|
|
|
|
report is that our contribution may differ in practice. Many thanks for
|
|
|
|
|
your understanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
